1. A student claims that the area between $y = \sin(x)$ and $y = 0$ from $x = 0$ to $x = 2\pi$ is $\int_0^{2\pi} \sin(x)\,dx = 0$. Which statement best explains the error in this reasoning?
- A.The integral should be computed using integration by parts.
- B.The student correctly computed the net signed area, but area requires integrating $|\sin(x)|$, which accounts for the region below the $x$-axis.
- C.The antiderivative of $\sin(x)$ is $\sin(x)$, so the calculation itself is wrong.
- D.The limits of integration should be $0$ to $\pi$ only because $\sin(x)$ is only positive there.
View Answer
Answer: The student correctly computed the net signed area, but area requires integrating $|\sin(x)|$, which accounts for the region below the $x$-axis.
Distinguish signed area from total area: The definite integral $\int_0^{2\pi} \sin(x)\,dx$ computes the net signed area. Since $\sin(x)$ is positive on $(0, \pi)$ and negative on $(\pi, 2\pi)$, the positive and negative areas cancel, giving $0$. Why the correct answer works: Option B correctly identifies the error: total area requires $\int_0^{2\pi} |\sin(x)|\,dx$, which equals $\int_0^{\pi} \sin(x)\,dx + \int_{\pi}^{2\pi} [-\sin(x)]\,dx = 2 + 2 = 4$. Why distractors fail: Option A is irrelevant—integration by parts is not needed for $\sin(x)$. Option C is wrong because the antiderivative of $\sin(x)$ is $-\cos(x)$, not $\sin(x)$, but the student's numerical result of $0$ is actually correct for the signed integral. Option D would only capture half the enclosed region, ignoring the area between $\sin(x)$ and $0$ on $(\pi, 2\pi)$.